Search for: "Rosetta Stanford"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
(Originally published in Stanford News on February 10, 2021) According to Stanford legal scholar Richard Thompson Ford, dress codes are a Rosetta Stone to decode social norms and resistance of a time and place. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:19 pm
We are using and developing intermediate isomorphic forms as a Rosetta Stone-like tool to accelerate the translation process and in hopes of providing support to future domain-specific Natural Language Processing technology. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am
Mark Lemley (Stanford Law) and I filed an amicus brief in 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
IPSC, Stanford Usual disclaimers: my summaries are partial; I’m missing many great presentations (including ones I’ve seen in earlier forms elsewhere and patent stuff; also, this year I tended to pick copyright over trademark but was often forced to make tough choices). [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:57 am
* Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:43 am
Parloff writes: The EFF, CDT, and Stanford’s CIS all reliably line up on the tech sector side in scrimmages with copyright holders. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:43 am
Parloff writes: The EFF, CDT, and Stanford’s CIS all reliably line up on the tech sector side in scrimmages with copyright holders. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 4:09 am
*According to Stanford, the phrase “African American” is no longer appropriate. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
Rosetta Books established that electronic rights are separate for authors. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
Susan Athey (now Stanford Business School, but in 2009 she was helping Microsoft attack Google on antitrust matters), Dr. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Measuring the degree to which brand asociations are held and how easily they are recalled can provide measures consistent w/the language of the law.Lisa Larrimore Ouellette (Stanford)Topic: Cognitive/Psychological Approaches to Modeling When and How Consumers Get Confused, Commenting on: Thomas R. [read post]
